Sizometry

  • Home
  • Devices
  • Comparisons
  • Tool
  • Insights
  • Methodology

Data sources and measurement methods are explained in our Methodology.

PrivacyTermsContact

Product names, trademarks, and registered trademarks belong to their respective owners. Sizometry is an independent reference site and is not affiliated with or endorsed by the manufacturers shown.

© 2026 Sizometry. All rights reserved.

Galaxy S24 FE vs moto g34

Device summary

Samsung

Galaxy S24 FE

Motorola

moto g34

Full specifications

Full specifications
Basic information
Release year20242024
Starting price——
Display size——
Dimensions77.3 mm × 162.0 mm × 8.0 mm74.6 mm × 162.7 mm × 8.0 mm
Weight213 g181 g
Front material——
Back material——

Basic information

Release year

Galaxy S24 FE
2024
moto g34
2024

Starting price

Galaxy S24 FE
—
moto g34
—

Display size

Galaxy S24 FE
—
moto g34
—

Dimensions

Galaxy S24 FE
77.3 mm × 162.0 mm × 8.0 mm
moto g34
74.6 mm × 162.7 mm × 8.0 mm

Weight

Galaxy S24 FE
213 g
moto g34
181 g

Front material

Galaxy S24 FE
—
moto g34
—

Back material

Galaxy S24 FE
—
moto g34
—

Key differences

The most meaningful measured gaps in size and weight — not an overall winner.

  • Weight

    moto g34

    32 g lighter

  • Width

    Galaxy S24 FE

    2.7 mm wider

  • Height

    moto g34

    0.7 mm taller · minor difference

  • Thickness

    Very similar thickness

View Galaxy S24 FE detailsView moto g34 details

User Experience Summary

Galaxy S24 FE

Strengths

  • Large, vibrant 6.7-inch AMOLED display that outperforms its price bracket
  • Rare optical telephoto camera uncommon at this price tier
  • Excellent independent durability results for drops, scratches, and water resistance

Compromises

  • 25W wired charging trails faster-charging mid-range rivals
  • Camera processing and low light fall short of the full-price S24
  • Exynos platform shows limits under heavier gaming or multitasking
Read user experience

moto g34

Strengths

  • Genuinely strong battery endurance for the price, aided by an efficient chipset
  • Affordable path to 5G connectivity for budget-conscious buyers
  • 120Hz display refresh rate is a notable inclusion at this price point

Compromises

  • HD+ display resolution is a step down from pricier G-series models
  • No ultrawide lens, with only a basic macro sensor alongside the main camera
  • 18W wired charging is slower than several similarly priced rivals
Read user experience

Compare in Sizometry Tool

See both devices at the same scale.

Compare in Tool

Dimensions and weight are based on manufacturer specifications. Handling estimates are derived from physical measurements. Methodology