Sizometry

  • Home
  • Devices
  • Comparisons
  • Tool
  • Insights
  • Methodology

Data sources and measurement methods are explained in our Methodology.

PrivacyTermsContact

Product names, trademarks, and registered trademarks belong to their respective owners. Sizometry is an independent reference site and is not affiliated with or endorsed by the manufacturers shown.

© 2026 Sizometry. All rights reserved.

Galaxy M55 vs Reno10 Pro

Device summary

Samsung

Galaxy M55

OPPO

Reno10 Pro

Full specifications

Full specifications
Basic information
Release year20242023
Starting price——
Display size——
Dimensions76.5 mm × 163.9 mm × 7.8 mm74.2 mm × 162.3 mm × 7.9 mm
Weight180 g185 g
Front material——
Back material——

Basic information

Release year

Galaxy M55
2024
Reno10 Pro
2023

Starting price

Galaxy M55
—
Reno10 Pro
—

Display size

Galaxy M55
—
Reno10 Pro
—

Dimensions

Galaxy M55
76.5 mm × 163.9 mm × 7.8 mm
Reno10 Pro
74.2 mm × 162.3 mm × 7.9 mm

Weight

Galaxy M55
180 g
Reno10 Pro
185 g

Front material

Galaxy M55
—
Reno10 Pro
—

Back material

Galaxy M55
—
Reno10 Pro
—

Key differences

The most meaningful measured gaps in size and weight — not an overall winner.

  • Width

    Galaxy M55

    2.3 mm wider

  • Height

    Galaxy M55

    1.6 mm taller · minor difference

  • Weight

    Galaxy M55

    5 g lighter · minor difference

  • Thickness

    Very similar thickness

View Galaxy M55 detailsView Reno10 Pro details

User Experience Summary

Galaxy M55

Strengths

  • Vivid 120Hz Super AMOLED Plus display with punchy colors
  • Dependable all-day battery life with 45W fast-charging support
  • Stereo speakers and under-display fingerprint sensor uncommon at this price

Compromises

  • Camera app is noticeably slow, especially for automatic night-mode shots
  • Battery and camera resolution reduced compared with the previous M54
  • Phone runs warm during extended gaming or camera app use
Read user experience

Compare in Sizometry Tool

See both devices at the same scale.

Compare in Tool

Dimensions and weight are based on manufacturer specifications. Handling estimates are derived from physical measurements. Methodology