Sizometry

  • Home
  • Devices
  • Comparisons
  • Tool
  • Insights
  • Methodology

Data sources and measurement methods are explained in our Methodology.

PrivacyTermsContact

Product names, trademarks, and registered trademarks belong to their respective owners. Sizometry is an independent reference site and is not affiliated with or endorsed by the manufacturers shown.

© 2026 Sizometry. All rights reserved.

Galaxy A25 vs moto g play

Device summary

Samsung

Galaxy A25

Motorola

moto g play

Full specifications

Full specifications
Basic information
Release year20232024
Starting price——
Display size——
Dimensions76.5 mm × 161.0 mm × 8.3 mm75.0 mm × 163.8 mm × 8.3 mm
Weight197 g185 g
Front material——
Back material——

Basic information

Release year

Galaxy A25
2023
moto g play
2024

Starting price

Galaxy A25
—
moto g play
—

Display size

Galaxy A25
—
moto g play
—

Dimensions

Galaxy A25
76.5 mm × 161.0 mm × 8.3 mm
moto g play
75.0 mm × 163.8 mm × 8.3 mm

Weight

Galaxy A25
197 g
moto g play
185 g

Front material

Galaxy A25
—
moto g play
—

Back material

Galaxy A25
—
moto g play
—

Key differences

The most meaningful measured gaps in size and weight — not an overall winner.

  • Weight

    moto g play

    12 g lighter

  • Height

    moto g play

    2.8 mm taller · minor difference

  • Width

    Galaxy A25

    1.5 mm wider · minor difference

  • Thickness

    Very similar thickness

View Galaxy A25 detailsView moto g play details

User Experience Summary

moto g play

Strengths

  • Surprisingly capable single 50MP main camera for this price tier
  • Excellent battery life stretching close to two days on typical use
  • Most accessible price point in Motorola's current lineup

Compromises

  • No 5G connectivity, which may limit long-term viability
  • Only one major Android OS update commitment
  • Snapdragon 680 4G is positioned at the entry level, suitable only for light tasks
Read user experience

Compare in Sizometry Tool

See both devices at the same scale.

Compare in Tool

Dimensions and weight are based on manufacturer specifications. Handling estimates are derived from physical measurements. Methodology