Apple
Device summary
vivo
X300
Full specifications
| Basic information | ||
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2025 | 2025 |
| Starting price | $799 | — |
| Display size | 6.3-inch | 6.3-inch |
| Dimensions | 71.5 mm × 149.6 mm × 8.0 mm | 71.9 mm × 150.6 mm × 8.0 mm |
| Weight | 177 g | 190 g |
| Front material | Ceramic Shield | — |
| Back material | Color-infused glass | — |
| Display | ||
| Display technology | Super Retina XDR OLED | — |
| Resolution | 2622 × 1206 | 2640 × 1216 |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2000 nits | 4500 nits |
| Protection | Ceramic Shield | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Apple A19 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB, 16 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB, 512 GB | 256 GB, 512 GB |
| Expandable storage | No | — |
| Cameras | ||
| Main camera | Fusion · 48 MP · ƒ/1.6 · 26 mm · Sensor-shift OIS | Main · 200 MP · ƒ/1.68 · OIS |
| Ultra-wide camera | Ultra Wide · 48 MP · ƒ/2.2 · 13 mm | Ultra Wide · 50 MP · ƒ/2.0 |
| Telephoto camera | — | Telephoto · 50 MP · ƒ/2.57 · 3x optical zoom · OIS |
| Front cameras | Center Stage · 18 MP · ƒ/1.9 | Front · 50 MP · ƒ/2.0 |
| Video recording | 4K Dolby Vision up to 60 fps, Spatial video up to 4K at 30 fps | 4K at 60 fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Wired charging | 25 W | 90 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 40 W |
| Charging standard | MagSafe, Qi2 | — |
| Video playback (Manufacturer claim) | 30 h | — |
| Battery type | Built-in rechargeable lithium-ion | Li-ion |
| Typical capacity | — | 6040 mAh |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular | 5G (sub-6 GHz), Gigabit LTE | 5G, LTE |
| Wi‑Fi | Wi‑Fi 7 (802.11be) | Wi‑Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 6 | Bluetooth 6.0 |
| USB | USB-C (USB 2) | USB 3.2 Gen 1 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| eSIM | Yes | — |
| Satellite | Emergency SOS via satellite | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Frame | Aluminum | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68; IP69 |
| Basic information | ||
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2025 | 2025 |
| Starting price | $799 | — |
| Display size | 6.3-inch | 6.3-inch |
| Dimensions | 71.5 mm × 149.6 mm × 8.0 mm | 71.9 mm × 150.6 mm × 8.0 mm |
| Weight | 177 g | 190 g |
| Front material | Ceramic Shield | — |
| Back material | Color-infused glass | — |
| Display | ||
| Display technology | Super Retina XDR OLED | — |
| Resolution | 2622 × 1206 | 2640 × 1216 |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2000 nits | 4500 nits |
| Protection | Ceramic Shield | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Apple A19 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB, 16 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB, 512 GB | 256 GB, 512 GB |
| Expandable storage | No | — |
| Cameras | ||
| Main camera | Fusion · 48 MP · ƒ/1.6 · 26 mm · Sensor-shift OIS | Main · 200 MP · ƒ/1.68 · OIS |
| Ultra-wide camera | Ultra Wide · 48 MP · ƒ/2.2 · 13 mm | Ultra Wide · 50 MP · ƒ/2.0 |
| Telephoto camera | — | Telephoto · 50 MP · ƒ/2.57 · 3x optical zoom · OIS |
| Front cameras | Center Stage · 18 MP · ƒ/1.9 | Front · 50 MP · ƒ/2.0 |
| Video recording | 4K Dolby Vision up to 60 fps, Spatial video up to 4K at 30 fps | 4K at 60 fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Wired charging | 25 W | 90 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 40 W |
| Charging standard | MagSafe, Qi2 | — |
| Video playback (Manufacturer claim) | 30 h | — |
| Battery type | Built-in rechargeable lithium-ion | Li-ion |
| Typical capacity | — | 6040 mAh |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular | 5G (sub-6 GHz), Gigabit LTE | 5G, LTE |
| Wi‑Fi | Wi‑Fi 7 (802.11be) | Wi‑Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 6 | Bluetooth 6.0 |
| USB | USB-C (USB 2) | USB 3.2 Gen 1 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| eSIM | Yes | — |
| Satellite | Emergency SOS via satellite | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Frame | Aluminum | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68; IP69 |
Key differences
The most meaningful measured gaps in size and weight — not an overall winner.
Weight
iPhone 17
13 g lighter
Height
X300
1 mm taller · minor difference
Width
Very similar width
Thickness
Very similar thickness
What these size differences mean
Calculated from the dimensions shown, rounded to 0.1 mm and 1 g. Percentages use the smaller measurement as the reference. Fold and rotation settings affect the dimensions compared.
- X300 is 0.4 mm (0.6% relative to iPhone 17) wider. Check this difference against the width of your current device and pocket opening.
- X300 is 1 mm (0.7% relative to iPhone 17) taller. This describes the body outline; screen diagonal alone does not tell you the overall size.
- Both have the same listed thickness (8 mm) at the displayed precision. Cases and camera protrusions can change the clearance you need.
- iPhone 17 is 13 g lighter. This is the listed device-weight difference, not a measured comfort rating.
Use these figures to compare physical size. They do not establish one-handed reach, pocket fit, durability or an overall winner.
Size in everyday life
Picture it in your front pocket.
2018 US jeans study · 20 brands · 80 pairs · Approx. 32-inch waists
iPhone 17
X300
Sources and measurement notes
Sizometry compares published specifications and calculates differences. These are not hands-on measurements or tests of comfort, performance or pocket fit.
iPhone 17
Check the exact model, year, region and configuration on the linked page. References may cover several variants. Folded and unfolded dimensions differ; cases and camera protrusions may change the space a device needs. Drawings share a relative scale and are not calibrated to life size on your screen.
iPhone 17 vs X300 Size Comparison
Related size comparisons
User Experience Summary
iPhone 17
Strengths
- ProMotion and Always-On in daily life
- Dependable mixed-use battery habits
- Mid-size handling versus Max and Air extremes
Compromises
- No dedicated telephoto
- Incremental for recent standard iPhone owners
- Slightly larger than the iPhone 16
X300
Strengths
- Praised 200 MP Zeiss camera system in a sub-72 mm compact body
- Dimensity 9500 responsive for daily use and fast camera processing
- 6.31-inch LTPO balances one-handed reach with flagship display quality
Compromises
- Thermal throttling under sustained high-load workloads
- Battery endurance below X300 Pro for power users
- Low-light and telephoto limits versus Pro despite daylight camera praise