Apple
Device summary
vivo
X200 FE
Full specifications
| Basic information | ||
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2025 | 2025 |
| Starting price | $799 | — |
| Display size | 6.3-inch | 6.3-inch |
| Dimensions | 71.5 mm × 149.6 mm × 8.0 mm | 71.8 mm × 150.8 mm × 8.0 mm |
| Weight | 177 g | 186 g |
| Front material | Ceramic Shield | — |
| Back material | Color-infused glass | — |
| Display | ||
| Display technology | Super Retina XDR OLED | — |
| Resolution | 2622 × 1206 | 2640 × 1216 |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2000 nits | 5000 nits |
| Protection | Ceramic Shield | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Apple A19 | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB, 16 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB, 512 GB | 256 GB, 512 GB |
| Expandable storage | No | — |
| Cameras | ||
| Main camera | Fusion · 48 MP · ƒ/1.6 · 26 mm · Sensor-shift OIS | Main · 50 MP · ƒ/1.88 · OIS |
| Ultra-wide camera | Ultra Wide · 48 MP · ƒ/2.2 · 13 mm | Ultra Wide · 8 MP · ƒ/2.2 |
| Periscope camera | — | Periscope Telephoto · 50 MP · ƒ/2.65 · 3x optical zoom · OIS |
| Front cameras | Center Stage · 18 MP · ƒ/1.9 | Front · 50 MP · ƒ/2.0 |
| Video recording | 4K Dolby Vision up to 60 fps, Spatial video up to 4K at 30 fps | 4K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Wired charging | 25 W | 90 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | — |
| Charging standard | MagSafe, Qi2 | — |
| Video playback (Manufacturer claim) | 30 h | — |
| Battery type | Built-in rechargeable lithium-ion | Lithium battery |
| Typical capacity | — | 6500 mAh |
| Rated capacity | — | 6340 mAh |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular | 5G (sub-6 GHz), Gigabit LTE | 5G, LTE |
| Wi‑Fi | Wi‑Fi 7 (802.11be) | Wi‑Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 6 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| USB | USB-C (USB 2) | USB Type‑C 2.0 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| eSIM | Yes | — |
| Satellite | Emergency SOS via satellite | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Frame | Aluminum | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68; IP69 |
| Basic information | ||
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2025 | 2025 |
| Starting price | $799 | — |
| Display size | 6.3-inch | 6.3-inch |
| Dimensions | 71.5 mm × 149.6 mm × 8.0 mm | 71.8 mm × 150.8 mm × 8.0 mm |
| Weight | 177 g | 186 g |
| Front material | Ceramic Shield | — |
| Back material | Color-infused glass | — |
| Display | ||
| Display technology | Super Retina XDR OLED | — |
| Resolution | 2622 × 1206 | 2640 × 1216 |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2000 nits | 5000 nits |
| Protection | Ceramic Shield | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Apple A19 | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB, 16 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB, 512 GB | 256 GB, 512 GB |
| Expandable storage | No | — |
| Cameras | ||
| Main camera | Fusion · 48 MP · ƒ/1.6 · 26 mm · Sensor-shift OIS | Main · 50 MP · ƒ/1.88 · OIS |
| Ultra-wide camera | Ultra Wide · 48 MP · ƒ/2.2 · 13 mm | Ultra Wide · 8 MP · ƒ/2.2 |
| Periscope camera | — | Periscope Telephoto · 50 MP · ƒ/2.65 · 3x optical zoom · OIS |
| Front cameras | Center Stage · 18 MP · ƒ/1.9 | Front · 50 MP · ƒ/2.0 |
| Video recording | 4K Dolby Vision up to 60 fps, Spatial video up to 4K at 30 fps | 4K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Wired charging | 25 W | 90 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | — |
| Charging standard | MagSafe, Qi2 | — |
| Video playback (Manufacturer claim) | 30 h | — |
| Battery type | Built-in rechargeable lithium-ion | Lithium battery |
| Typical capacity | — | 6500 mAh |
| Rated capacity | — | 6340 mAh |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular | 5G (sub-6 GHz), Gigabit LTE | 5G, LTE |
| Wi‑Fi | Wi‑Fi 7 (802.11be) | Wi‑Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 6 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| USB | USB-C (USB 2) | USB Type‑C 2.0 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| eSIM | Yes | — |
| Satellite | Emergency SOS via satellite | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Frame | Aluminum | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68; IP69 |
Key differences
The most meaningful measured gaps in size and weight — not an overall winner.
Weight
iPhone 17
9 g lighter · minor difference
Height
X200 FE
1.2 mm taller · minor difference
Width
Very similar width
Thickness
Very similar thickness
What these size differences mean
Calculated from the dimensions shown, rounded to 0.1 mm and 1 g. Percentages use the smaller measurement as the reference. Fold and rotation settings affect the dimensions compared.
- X200 FE is 0.3 mm (0.4% relative to iPhone 17) wider. Check this difference against the width of your current device and pocket opening.
- X200 FE is 1.2 mm (0.8% relative to iPhone 17) taller. This describes the body outline; screen diagonal alone does not tell you the overall size.
- Both have the same listed thickness (8 mm) at the displayed precision. Cases and camera protrusions can change the clearance you need.
- iPhone 17 is 9 g lighter. This is the listed device-weight difference, not a measured comfort rating.
Use these figures to compare physical size. They do not establish one-handed reach, pocket fit, durability or an overall winner.
Size in everyday life
Picture it in your front pocket.
2018 US jeans study · 20 brands · 80 pairs · Approx. 32-inch waists
iPhone 17
X200 FE
Sources and measurement notes
Sizometry compares published specifications and calculates differences. These are not hands-on measurements or tests of comfort, performance or pocket fit.
iPhone 17
Check the exact model, year, region and configuration on the linked page. References may cover several variants. Folded and unfolded dimensions differ; cases and camera protrusions may change the space a device needs. Drawings share a relative scale and are not calibrated to life size on your screen.
iPhone 17 vs X200 FE Size Comparison
User Experience Summary
iPhone 17
Strengths
- ProMotion and Always-On in daily life
- Dependable mixed-use battery habits
- Mid-size handling versus Max and Air extremes
Compromises
- No dedicated telephoto
- Incremental for recent standard iPhone owners
- Slightly larger than the iPhone 16
X200 FE
Strengths
- Exceptional compact ergonomics — 71.76 mm wide and 186 g with Zeiss triple cameras
- Dimensity 9300-class daily speed in a pocket-friendly flagship
- Clear successor to X200 Pro mini form-factor demand
Compromises
- Smaller battery than Pro models — tighter busy-day endurance
- Camera hardware and low-light trail X200 Pro despite Zeiss branding
- OriginOS polish and regional SKU confusion at premium pricing