Device summary

Polar

Grit X2

Polar

Vantage M3

Full specifications

Full specifications
Basic information
Release year20252024
Starting price$520$433
Display size1.3-inch1.3-inch
Dimensions44.7 mm × 44.7 mm × 12.5 mm44.7 mm × 44.7 mm × 12.2 mm
Weight39 g35 g
Front materialSapphire GlassGorilla Glass
Back materialPlasticPlastic
Display
Display technologyAMOLEDAMOLED
Resolution416 × 416416 × 416
ProtectionSapphire GlassGorilla Glass
Performance
Storage32 GB32 GB
Expandable storageNoNo
Battery & charging
Charging standardProprietary / USB-C. Smartwatch mode up to 7 days; performance training (GPS + HR) up to 30 h; eco training up to 90 h (power-save — not everyday life). Complete watch 62 g with wristband; body 39 g withoutProprietary / USB-C. Smartwatch mode up to 7 days; performance training (GPS + HR) up to 30 h; eco training up to 90 h (power-save — not everyday life). Complete watch 53 g with wristband; body 35 g without
Battery typeLi-Pol (310 mAh)Li-Pol (310 mAh)
Connectivity
CellularGPS / GLONASS / Galileo / BeiDou / QZSS (dual-frequency), Offline full-color maps and route guidance, Polar Elixir™ (ECG GEN 1, SpO2 GEN 1, skin temp GEN 1, OHR GEN 4), Barometer; magnetometer compass; ambient light sensor, Polar FlowGPS / GLONASS / Galileo / BeiDou / QZSS (dual-frequency), Offline full-color maps and route guidance, Polar Elixir™ (ECG GEN 1, SpO2 GEN 1, skin temp GEN 1, OHR GEN 4), Barometer; magnetometer compass; ambient light sensor, Polar Flow
BluetoothBluetooth® LEBluetooth® LE
Build & durability
FramePlastic case; stainless steel bezelPlastic case; stainless steel bezel
Ingress protectionWR50 (50 m); MIL-STD-810HWR50 (50 m)

Key differences

The most meaningful measured gaps in size and weight — not an overall winner.

  • Weight

    Vantage M3

    4 g lighter · minor difference

  • Thickness

    Vantage M3

    0.3 mm thinner · minor difference

  • Height

    Very similar height

  • Width

    Very similar width

What these size differences mean

Calculated from the dimensions shown, rounded to 0.1 mm and 1 g. Percentages use the smaller measurement as the reference. Fold and rotation settings affect the dimensions compared.

  • Both have the same listed width (44.7 mm) at the displayed precision. Check this difference against the width of your current device and pocket opening.
  • Both have the same listed height (44.7 mm) at the displayed precision. This describes the body outline; screen diagonal alone does not tell you the overall size.
  • Grit X2 is 0.3 mm (2.5% relative to Vantage M3) thicker. Cases and camera protrusions can change the clearance you need.
  • Vantage M3 is 4 g lighter. This is the listed device-weight difference, not a measured comfort rating.

Use these figures to compare physical size. They do not establish one-handed reach, pocket fit, durability or an overall winner.

Sources and measurement notes

Sizometry compares published specifications and calculates differences. These are not hands-on measurements or tests of comfort, performance or pocket fit.

Check the exact model, year, region and configuration on the linked page. References may cover several variants. Folded and unfolded dimensions differ; cases and camera protrusions may change the space a device needs. Drawings share a relative scale and are not calibrated to life size on your screen.

Grit X2 vs Vantage M3 Size Comparison