POCO
Device summary
Xiaomi
17T
Full specifications
| Basic information | ||
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Starting price | — | — |
| Display size | 6.6-inch | 6.6-inch |
| Dimensions | 75.2 mm × 157.5 mm × 8.4 mm | 75.2 mm × 157.6 mm × 8.2 mm |
| Weight | 201 g | 200 g |
| Front material | — | — |
| Back material | — | — |
| Display | ||
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2756 × 1268 | — |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 3500 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Dimensity 8500-Ultra | MediaTek Dimensity 8500-Ultra |
| Cameras | ||
| Main camera | Wide · 50 MP · OIS | Wide · 50 MP |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | Ultra Wide · 12 MP |
| Periscope camera | — | Periscope Telephoto · 50 MP · 5x Optical Zoom |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Wired charging | 100 W | 67 W |
| Charging standard | — | HyperCharge |
| Typical capacity | 6500 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Build & durability | ||
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Basic information | ||
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Starting price | — | — |
| Display size | 6.6-inch | 6.6-inch |
| Dimensions | 75.2 mm × 157.5 mm × 8.4 mm | 75.2 mm × 157.6 mm × 8.2 mm |
| Weight | 201 g | 200 g |
| Front material | — | — |
| Back material | — | — |
| Display | ||
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2756 × 1268 | — |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 3500 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Dimensity 8500-Ultra | MediaTek Dimensity 8500-Ultra |
| Cameras | ||
| Main camera | Wide · 50 MP · OIS | Wide · 50 MP |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | Ultra Wide · 12 MP |
| Periscope camera | — | Periscope Telephoto · 50 MP · 5x Optical Zoom |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Wired charging | 100 W | 67 W |
| Charging standard | — | HyperCharge |
| Typical capacity | 6500 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Build & durability | ||
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
Key differences
The most meaningful measured gaps in size and weight — not an overall winner.
Thickness
17T
0.2 mm thinner · minor difference
Height
Very similar height
Width
Very similar width
Weight
Very similar weight
What these size differences mean
Calculated from the dimensions shown, rounded to 0.1 mm and 1 g. Percentages use the smaller measurement as the reference. Fold and rotation settings affect the dimensions compared.
- Both have the same listed width (75.2 mm) at the displayed precision. Check this difference against the width of your current device and pocket opening.
- 17T is 0.1 mm (0.1% relative to X8 Pro) taller. This describes the body outline; screen diagonal alone does not tell you the overall size.
- X8 Pro is 0.2 mm (2.4% relative to 17T) thicker. Cases and camera protrusions can change the clearance you need.
- 17T is 1 g lighter. This is the listed device-weight difference, not a measured comfort rating.
Use these figures to compare physical size. They do not establish one-handed reach, pocket fit, durability or an overall winner.
Size in everyday life
Picture it in your front pocket.
2018 US jeans study · 20 brands · 80 pairs · Approx. 32-inch waists
X8 Pro
17T
Sources and measurement notes
Sizometry compares published specifications and calculates differences. These are not hands-on measurements or tests of comfort, performance or pocket fit.
Check the exact model, year, region and configuration on the linked page. References may cover several variants. Folded and unfolded dimensions differ; cases and camera protrusions may change the space a device needs. Drawings share a relative scale and are not calibrated to life size on your screen.
X8 Pro vs 17T Size Comparison
User Experience Summary
17T
Strengths
- Standout 5x periscope telephoto for the price tier
- Excellent silicon-carbon battery endurance
- Bright outdoor display for travel use
Compromises
- Plastic frame and value-tier materials
- Slow 67 W charging for a huge battery
- Mid-tier chip limits heavy gaming and editing