Amazfit
Device summary
HONOR
Watch 4
Full specifications
| Basic information | ||
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2023 | 2023 |
| Starting price | — | — |
| Display size | 1.9-inch | 1.8-inch |
| Dimensions | 38.1 mm × 45.9 mm × 11.2 mm | 39.1 mm × 45.3 mm × 11.2 mm |
| Weight | 26 g | 32 g |
| Front material | — | — |
| Back material | — | — |
| Display | ||
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 320 × 380 | 450 × 390 |
| Performance | ||
| Expandable storage | No | No |
| Storage | — | 4 GB |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Charging standard | Magnetic charging | Magnetic charging |
| Battery type | Lithium-ion | Lithium-ion |
| Rated capacity | — | 451 mAh |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular | GPS / multi-GNSS | — |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.2 / BLE / BR / EDR (2.4 GHz) |
| Build & durability | ||
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Basic information | ||
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2023 | 2023 |
| Starting price | — | — |
| Display size | 1.9-inch | 1.8-inch |
| Dimensions | 38.1 mm × 45.9 mm × 11.2 mm | 39.1 mm × 45.3 mm × 11.2 mm |
| Weight | 26 g | 32 g |
| Front material | — | — |
| Back material | — | — |
| Display | ||
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 320 × 380 | 450 × 390 |
| Performance | ||
| Expandable storage | No | No |
| Storage | — | 4 GB |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Charging standard | Magnetic charging | Magnetic charging |
| Battery type | Lithium-ion | Lithium-ion |
| Rated capacity | — | 451 mAh |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular | GPS / multi-GNSS | — |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.2 / BLE / BR / EDR (2.4 GHz) |
| Build & durability | ||
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
Key differences
The most meaningful measured gaps in size and weight — not an overall winner.
Weight
Amazfit Bip 5
6 g lighter · minor difference
Width
Watch 4
1 mm wider · minor difference
Display size
Amazfit Bip 5
0.2 in larger display · minor difference
Height
Amazfit Bip 5
0.6 mm taller · minor difference
What these size differences mean
Calculated from the dimensions shown, rounded to 0.1 mm and 1 g. Percentages use the smaller measurement as the reference. Fold and rotation settings affect the dimensions compared.
- Watch 4 is 1 mm (2.6% relative to Amazfit Bip 5) wider. Check this difference against the width of your current device and pocket opening.
- Amazfit Bip 5 is 0.6 mm (1.3% relative to Watch 4) taller. This describes the body outline; screen diagonal alone does not tell you the overall size.
- Both have the same listed thickness (11.2 mm) at the displayed precision. Cases and camera protrusions can change the clearance you need.
- Amazfit Bip 5 is 6 g lighter. This is the listed device-weight difference, not a measured comfort rating.
Use these figures to compare physical size. They do not establish one-handed reach, pocket fit, durability or an overall winner.
Sources and measurement notes
Sizometry compares published specifications and calculates differences. These are not hands-on measurements or tests of comfort, performance or pocket fit.
Amazfit Bip 5
Check the exact model, year, region and configuration on the linked page. References may cover several variants. Folded and unfolded dimensions differ; cases and camera protrusions may change the space a device needs. Drawings share a relative scale and are not calibrated to life size on your screen.